Posted On: March 30, 2007 by Michael J. Hassen Email This Post Bookmark:
Bookmark Class%20Action%20Defense%20Cases%26%238212%3BIn%20re%20MERSCORP%3A%20Judicial%20Panel%20On%20Multidistrict%20Litigation%20%28MDL%29%20Grants%20Plaintiff%27s%20Motion%20Unopposed%20By%20Defense%20Attorneys%20To%20Centralize%20Class%20Action%20Litigation at del.icio.us Digg Class%20Action%20Defense%20Cases%26%238212%3BIn%20re%20MERSCORP%3A%20Judicial%20Panel%20On%20Multidistrict%20Litigation%20%28MDL%29%20Grants%20Plaintiff%27s%20Motion%20Unopposed%20By%20Defense%20Attorneys%20To%20Centralize%20Class%20Action%20Litigation at Digg.com Bookmark Class%20Action%20Defense%20Cases%26%238212%3BIn%20re%20MERSCORP%3A%20Judicial%20Panel%20On%20Multidistrict%20Litigation%20%28MDL%29%20Grants%20Plaintiff%27s%20Motion%20Unopposed%20By%20Defense%20Attorneys%20To%20Centralize%20Class%20Action%20Litigation at Spurl.net Bookmark Class%20Action%20Defense%20Cases%26%238212%3BIn%20re%20MERSCORP%3A%20Judicial%20Panel%20On%20Multidistrict%20Litigation%20%28MDL%29%20Grants%20Plaintiff%27s%20Motion%20Unopposed%20By%20Defense%20Attorneys%20To%20Centralize%20Class%20Action%20Litigation at Simpy.com Bookmark Class%20Action%20Defense%20Cases%26%238212%3BIn%20re%20MERSCORP%3A%20Judicial%20Panel%20On%20Multidistrict%20Litigation%20%28MDL%29%20Grants%20Plaintiff%27s%20Motion%20Unopposed%20By%20Defense%20Attorneys%20To%20Centralize%20Class%20Action%20Litigation at NewsVine Blink this Class%20Action%20Defense%20Cases%26%238212%3BIn%20re%20MERSCORP%3A%20Judicial%20Panel%20On%20Multidistrict%20Litigation%20%28MDL%29%20Grants%20Plaintiff%27s%20Motion%20Unopposed%20By%20Defense%20Attorneys%20To%20Centralize%20Class%20Action%20Litigation at blinklist.com Bookmark Class%20Action%20Defense%20Cases%26%238212%3BIn%20re%20MERSCORP%3A%20Judicial%20Panel%20On%20Multidistrict%20Litigation%20%28MDL%29%20Grants%20Plaintiff%27s%20Motion%20Unopposed%20By%20Defense%20Attorneys%20To%20Centralize%20Class%20Action%20Litigation at Furl.net Bookmark Class%20Action%20Defense%20Cases%26%238212%3BIn%20re%20MERSCORP%3A%20Judicial%20Panel%20On%20Multidistrict%20Litigation%20%28MDL%29%20Grants%20Plaintiff%27s%20Motion%20Unopposed%20By%20Defense%20Attorneys%20To%20Centralize%20Class%20Action%20Litigation at reddit.com Fark Class%20Action%20Defense%20Cases%26%238212%3BIn%20re%20MERSCORP%3A%20Judicial%20Panel%20On%20Multidistrict%20Litigation%20%28MDL%29%20Grants%20Plaintiff%27s%20Motion%20Unopposed%20By%20Defense%20Attorneys%20To%20Centralize%20Class%20Action%20Litigation at Fark.com Bookmark Class%20Action%20Defense%20Cases%26%238212%3BIn%20re%20MERSCORP%3A%20Judicial%20Panel%20On%20Multidistrict%20Litigation%20%28MDL%29%20Grants%20Plaintiff%27s%20Motion%20Unopposed%20By%20Defense%20Attorneys%20To%20Centralize%20Class%20Action%20Litigation at Yahoo! MyWeb

Class Action Defense Cases—In re MERSCORP: Judicial Panel On Multidistrict Litigation (MDL) Grants Plaintiff's Motion Unopposed By Defense Attorneys To Centralize Class Action Litigation

Judicial Panel Grants Request, Unopposed by Defense, for Pretrial Coordination of Class Action Lawsuits Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407 but Selects Southern District of Texas as Appropriate Transferee Court for Class Actions

Several class action lawsuits were filed against MERSCORP and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. challenging mortgage loan registration fees and alleging that the fees violate the federal Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA) Racketeering Influenced Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO). In re MERSCORP Inc., et al., Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA) Litig., 473 F.Supp.2d 1379, 1379 (Jud.Pan.Mult.Lit. 2007). Lawyers for all plaintiffs in the separate class action lawsuits filed a motion with the Judicial Panel for Multidistrict Litigation (MDL) requesting centralization of the class actions pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407 in the Eastern District of Texas. Id. Defense attorneys agreed that pretrial coordination was appropriate, and agreed further that the Eastern District of Texas was the appropriate transferee court. Id. The Judicial Panel granted the motion to centralize the class actions, but noted that the Eastern District of Texas “declined the assignment due to its heavy caseload.” Id., at 1379-80. Accordingly, the Panel transferred the cases to the Southern District of Texas for pretrial proceedings. Id., at 1380.

Download PDF file of In re MERSCORP Transfer Order