<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>

<rdf:RDF
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"
xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/">

<channel rdf:about="http://classactiondefense.jmbm.com/">
<title>Class Action Defense Blog</title>
<link>http://classactiondefense.jmbm.com/</link>
<description></description>
<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
<dc:creator></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-05T14:17:38-08:00</dc:date>
<admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.33" />


<items>
<rdf:Seq><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://classactiondefense.jmbm.com/2008/07/class_action_defense_casesin_r_100.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://classactiondefense.jmbm.com/2008/07/employment_class_action_lawsui.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://classactiondefense.jmbm.com/2008/07/class_action_defense_casesin_r_99.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://classactiondefense.jmbm.com/2008/07/facta_class_action_defense_cas_10.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://classactiondefense.jmbm.com/2008/07/walmart_class_action_defense_c_2.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://classactiondefense.jmbm.com/2008/07/songbeverly_class_action_defen.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://classactiondefense.jmbm.com/2008/07/pslra_class_action_defense_cas_11.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://classactiondefense.jmbm.com/2008/06/punitive_damages_class_action_1.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://classactiondefense.jmbm.com/2008/06/business_as_usual_labor_law_cl.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://classactiondefense.jmbm.com/2008/06/class_action_defense_casesin_r_97.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://classactiondefense.jmbm.com/2008/06/usps_class_action_defense_case.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://classactiondefense.jmbm.com/2008/06/supreme_court_cuts_class_actio.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://classactiondefense.jmbm.com/2008/06/pslra_class_action_defense_cas_10.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://classactiondefense.jmbm.com/2008/06/bcbg_class_action_defense_case.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://classactiondefense.jmbm.com/2008/06/gm_class_action_defense_casesg.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://classactiondefense.jmbm.com/2008/06/flsa_class_action_defense_case_14.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://classactiondefense.jmbm.com/2008/06/labor_law_class_action_cases_1.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://classactiondefense.jmbm.com/2008/06/national_bank_act_class_action.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://classactiondefense.jmbm.com/2008/06/flsa_class_action_defense_case_13.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://classactiondefense.jmbm.com/2008/06/class_action_defense_caseswhit_1.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://classactiondefense.jmbm.com/2008/06/class_action_defense_casesamar.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://classactiondefense.jmbm.com/2008/06/happy_fathers_day_from_the_cla.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://classactiondefense.jmbm.com/2008/06/unfair_business_practice_class.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://classactiondefense.jmbm.com/2008/06/class_action_defense_casesin_r_96.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://classactiondefense.jmbm.com/2008/06/class_action_defense_caseschav.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://classactiondefense.jmbm.com/2008/06/vioxx_class_action_defense_cas_2.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://classactiondefense.jmbm.com/2008/06/class_action_defense_casesvan.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://classactiondefense.jmbm.com/2008/06/ucl_class_action_defense_cases_5.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://classactiondefense.jmbm.com/2008/06/pslra_class_action_defense_cas_9.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://classactiondefense.jmbm.com/2008/06/labor_law_class_action_cases.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://classactiondefense.jmbm.com/2008/06/labor_law_class_action_defense_4.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://classactiondefense.jmbm.com/2008/06/class_action_defense_casesboro_1.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://classactiondefense.jmbm.com/2008/06/class_action_defense_newsbroca.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://classactiondefense.jmbm.com/2008/06/cafa_class_action_defense_remo.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://classactiondefense.jmbm.com/2008/06/class_action_defense_newsclass_1.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://classactiondefense.jmbm.com/2008/06/ucl_class_action_defense_cases_4.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://classactiondefense.jmbm.com/2008/06/class_action_defense_casesshar.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://classactiondefense.jmbm.com/2008/05/employmentrelated_class_action_1.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://classactiondefense.jmbm.com/2008/05/class_action_defense_casesin_r_95.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://classactiondefense.jmbm.com/2008/05/class_action_defense_removal_c.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://classactiondefense.jmbm.com/2008/05/time_warner_class_action_defen.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://classactiondefense.jmbm.com/2008/05/class_action_defense_issuesnew.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://classactiondefense.jmbm.com/2008/05/facta_class_action_defense_cas_9.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://classactiondefense.jmbm.com/2008/05/happy_memorial_day_from_the_cl.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://classactiondefense.jmbm.com/2008/05/labor_law_class_action_lawsuit_8.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://classactiondefense.jmbm.com/2008/05/facta_class_action_defense_cas_8.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://classactiondefense.jmbm.com/2008/05/fcra_class_action_defense_case_5.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://classactiondefense.jmbm.com/2008/05/cafa_class_action_defense_case_18.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://classactiondefense.jmbm.com/2008/05/class_action_defense_caseschar.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://classactiondefense.jmbm.com/2008/05/cafa_class_action_defense_case_16.html" />
</rdf:Seq>
</items>

</channel>

<item rdf:about="http://classactiondefense.jmbm.com/2008/07/class_action_defense_casesin_r_100.html">
<title>Class Action Defense Cases&amp;#8212;In re Merrill Lynch: Judicial Panel On Multidistrict Litigation (MDL) Grants Unopposed Defense Motion To Centralize Individual And Class Action Litigation In Southern District Of New York</title>
<link>http://classactiondefense.jmbm.com/2008/07/class_action_defense_casesin_r_100.html</link>
<description> Judicial Panel Grants Defense Motion for Pretrial Coordination of Individual and Class Action Lawsuits Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. &amp;#167; 1407, Unopposed by Individual and Class Action Plaintiffs and Supported by Some Responding Individual and Class Action Plaintiffs, and Transfers...</description>
<dc:subject>40Class Action Court Decisions</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>michael</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-05T14:17:38-08:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://classactiondefense.jmbm.com/2008/07/employment_class_action_lawsui.html">
<title>Employment Class Action Lawsuits Again Top List Of New Class Action Cases Filed In California State And Federal Courts</title>
<link>http://classactiondefense.jmbm.com/2008/07/employment_class_action_lawsui.html</link>
<description> As a resource to California class action defense attorneys, we provide weekly, unofficial summaries of the legal categories for new class action lawsuits filed in California state and federal courts in the Los Angeles, San Francisco, San Jose, Sacramento,...</description>
<dc:subject>10Class Actions In The News</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>michael</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-05T07:13:01-08:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://classactiondefense.jmbm.com/2008/07/class_action_defense_casesin_r_99.html">
<title>Class Action Defense Cases&amp;#8212;In re Chocolate Confectionary: Judicial Panel On Multidistrict Litigation (MDL) Grants Plaintiffs Motions To Centralize Individual And Class Action Litigation But Selects Middle District of Pennsylvania</title>
<link>http://classactiondefense.jmbm.com/2008/07/class_action_defense_casesin_r_99.html</link>
<description> Judicial Panel Grants Plaintiffs Motions for Pretrial Coordination of Individual and Class Action Lawsuits Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. &amp;#167; 1407, Unopposed by Other Individual and Class Action Plaintiffs and by Responding Defendants, and Transfers Individual and Class Action Lawsuits...</description>
<dc:subject>40Class Action Court Decisions</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>michael</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-04T14:14:43-08:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://classactiondefense.jmbm.com/2008/07/facta_class_action_defense_cas_10.html">
<title>FACTA Class Action Defense Cases&amp;#8212;In re Oilily: Judicial Panel On Multidistrict Litigation (MDL) Grants Plaintiff Motion Unopposed By Defense To Centralize Class Action Litigation In Northern District of California</title>
<link>http://classactiondefense.jmbm.com/2008/07/facta_class_action_defense_cas_10.html</link>
<description> Judicial Panel Grants Plaintiff Request for Pretrial Coordination of Class Action Lawsuits Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. &amp;#167; 1407, Unopposed by any Class Action Defendants, and Transfers Class Actions to Northern District of California Two class actions &amp;#8211; one in...</description>
<dc:subject>40Class Action Court Decisions</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>michael</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-04T06:43:07-08:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://classactiondefense.jmbm.com/2008/07/walmart_class_action_defense_c_2.html">
<title>Wal-Mart Class Action Defense Cases&amp;#8211;Braun v. Wal-Mart: Minnesota Trial Court Rules In Favor Of Class Action Plaintiffs In Labor Law Class Action Against Wal-Mart And Finds Maximum Potential Damages May Approximate $2 Billion</title>
<link>http://classactiondefense.jmbm.com/2008/07/walmart_class_action_defense_c_2.html</link>
<description> Wal-Mart Willfully Violated Minnesota Labor Laws Entitling Members Covered by Class Action Lawsuit to Millions in Damages and Potentially Billions in Civil Penalties Minnesota Trial Court Holds Plaintiffs filed a labor law class action against Wal-Mart in Minnesota state...</description>
<dc:subject>40Class Action Court Decisions</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>michael</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-03T03:36:46-08:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://classactiondefense.jmbm.com/2008/07/songbeverly_class_action_defen.html">
<title>Song-Beverly Class Action Defense Cases&amp;#8211;Absher v. AutoZone: California Court Affirms Defense Judgment In Class Action Under Song-Beverly Act Because Act Applies Only To Personal Information Sought By Merchant At Time Of Sale</title>
<link>http://classactiondefense.jmbm.com/2008/07/songbeverly_class_action_defen.html</link>
<description> Summary Judgment Properly Granted in Class Action under California&amp;#8217;s Song-Beverly Act, Concerning Merchant Requests for Personal Information in Connection with Credit Card Transactions, because Class Action Arose from Merchant Request as part of a Return Transaction rather than a...</description>
<dc:subject>40Class Action Court Decisions</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>michael</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-02T04:07:48-08:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://classactiondefense.jmbm.com/2008/07/pslra_class_action_defense_cas_11.html">
<title>PSLRA Class Action Defense Cases&amp;#8211;In re 2007 Novastar Financial: Missouri Federal Court Grants Defense Motion To Dismiss Securities Class Action For Failure To Plead Fraud With Requisite Specificity</title>
<link>http://classactiondefense.jmbm.com/2008/07/pslra_class_action_defense_cas_11.html</link>
<description> Securities Fraud Class Action Complaint, though Extremely Lengthy, Failed to Plead Fraud with Specificity Required by PSLRA (Private Securities Litigation Reform Act) Missouri Federal Court Holds Plaintiff filed a class action complaint against Novastar Financial and three of its...</description>
<dc:subject>40Class Action Court Decisions</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>michael</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-01T04:04:58-08:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://classactiondefense.jmbm.com/2008/06/punitive_damages_class_action_1.html">
<title>Punitive Damages Class Action Defense Cases&amp;#8211;Exxon v. Baker: Supreme Court Reduces Class Action Punitive Award In Exxon Valdez Case Holding Punitive Damages Under Federal Maritime Law Should Be Limited To Amount Of Compensatory Damages</title>
<link>http://classactiondefense.jmbm.com/2008/06/punitive_damages_class_action_1.html</link>
<description> $2.5 Billion Punitive Damage Award in Class Action Against Exxon Arising out of Valdez Oil Spill Excessive because Considerations of Predictability Warranted 1:1 Ratio Cap on Punitive Damages Awarded under Federal Maritime Law Supreme Court Holds, Resulting in Reduction...</description>
<dc:subject>40Class Action Court Decisions</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>michael</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-30T03:53:59-08:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://classactiondefense.jmbm.com/2008/06/business_as_usual_labor_law_cl.html">
<title>Business As Usual:  Labor Law Class Action Lawsuits Dominate New Class Action Cases Filed In California State And Federal Courts Over The Past Week</title>
<link>http://classactiondefense.jmbm.com/2008/06/business_as_usual_labor_law_cl.html</link>
<description> To assist class action defense attorneys anticipate the types of class actions against which they will have to defend in California, we provide weekly, unofficial summaries of the legal categories for new class action lawsuits filed in California state...</description>
<dc:subject>10Class Actions In The News</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>michael</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-28T07:29:24-08:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://classactiondefense.jmbm.com/2008/06/class_action_defense_casesin_r_97.html">
<title>Class Action Defense Cases&amp;#8212;In re Orleans Homebuilders: Judicial Panel On Multidistrict Litigation (MDL) Grants Defense Motion To Centralize Class Action Litigation In Eastern District of Pennsylvania</title>
<link>http://classactiondefense.jmbm.com/2008/06/class_action_defense_casesin_r_97.html</link>
<description> Judicial Panel Grants Defense Request for Pretrial Coordination of Class Action Lawsuits Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. &amp;#167; 1407, Unopposed by Class Action Plaintiffs, and Transfers Actions to Eastern District of Pennsylvania Two class actions &amp;#8211; one in New Jersey...</description>
<dc:subject>40Class Action Court Decisions</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>michael</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-27T13:11:37-08:00</dc:date>
</item>


</rdf:RDF>